 |
CSOs Slam NASS Over Interference in JAMB and WAEC Affairs |
CSOs slam NASS over interference in JAMB and WAEC, urging transparency, institutional independence, and respect for examination bodies.
Concerns are rising in Nigeria’s education sector as civil society organisations (CSOs) raise alarms over legislative interference in national examination bodies. The debate, centered on JAMB and WAEC, highlights the delicate balance between oversight and institutional independence. Stakeholders warn that crossing this line could undermine public trust in examination processes.
Why CSOs Are Criticizing NASS
A coalition of civil society organisations has criticized members of the National Assembly (NASS) over what it describes as undue interference in the operations of examination bodies. According to the CSOs, such actions risk weakening the credibility of institutions responsible for national assessments.
Speaking for the coalition, Okpanachi Jacob, Convener of the Social Transparency and Youth Leadership Advancement Initiative, explained that their concerns are rooted in governance best practices rather than accusations of wrongdoing.
Examination Bodies Affected
Key Institutions Mentioned
The CSOs referenced several major examination bodies, including:
- Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) – responsible for university entrance examinations
- West African Examinations Council (WAEC) – conducts secondary school exams
- National Examinations Council (NECO)
- National Business and Technical Examinations Board (NABTEB)
For official information on these bodies, visit JAMB’s official website (https://www.jamb.gov.ng) and WAEC Nigeria (https://www.waecnigeria.org).
Call for Transparency and Mutual Respect
The coalition emphasized that interactions between lawmakers and examination bodies should be guided by:
- Transparency and due process
- Mutual respect for institutional roles
- Clear boundaries between oversight and administration
According to Jacob, maintaining professional standards is essential for sustaining nationwide confidence in examination outcomes.
Clarification From the CSOs
Importantly, the CSOs clarified that their position is not based on proven misconduct. Instead, it reflects a proactive effort to strengthen accountability, governance, and public confidence in Nigeria’s education system.
They also stressed the need for internal clarity within legislative committees to enhance efficiency and trust.
Legislative Oversight vs Institutional Independence
Finding the Right Balance
Lawmakers routinely conduct quarterly hearings to review:
- Budget allocations
- Procurement processes
- Examination integrity and anti-cheating measures
While such oversight is constitutional, CSOs argue it must not erode the autonomy of examination bodies. Independent audits and ethical standards, they say, should be pursued without operational interference.
More details on legislative roles can be found on the National Assembly of Nigeria website (https://www.nass.gov.ng).
Appeal to House Leadership
The coalition urged the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to continue promoting ethical conduct, internal cohesion, and strict adherence to legislative rules. They believe this approach will strengthen democratic institutions and protect the credibility of Nigeria’s education sector.
Why This Matters to Nigerians
National examinations affect millions of students annually. Any perception of undue influence can damage trust, discourage merit-based assessment, and weaken educational standards nationwide.
Protecting the independence of bodies like JAMB and WAEC is therefore in the national interest.
Conclusion and Call to Action
The stance of the CSOs serves as a reminder that strong institutions thrive on transparency, respect, and clearly defined roles. As discussions continue, collaboration—not confrontation—remains key to safeguarding Nigeria’s education system.
What’s your view on legislative oversight of examination bodies? Share your thoughts in the comments and share this article to keep the conversation going.
